Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Estados Unidos. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Estados Unidos. Mostrar todas las entradas

29/9/08

Inversión: ¿Los paraisos seguros son todavía seguros?




Como suele suceder, Business Week publicó un articulo muy interesante sobre inversiones. Quizas sea conveniente leerlo con el articulo "5 ways that Wall Street's Mess Hurts Main Street" que se puede encontrar en http://www.greenfaucet.com/the-market/5-ways-that-wall-streets-mess-hurts-main-street/89122.

Por el momento, podemos leer este articulo escrito por David Bogoslaw y que se encuentra en http://www.businessweek.com/investor/content/sep2008/pi20080926_686123.htm.

Investing: Are 'Safe Havens' Still Safe?
Issue of more Treasury bills to pay for the Wall Street bailout may impact investor confidence in U.S. bonds as a safe haven. Time to consider some alternatives


In finance, safety isn't what it used to be. After a couple of money-market funds came perilously close to breaking the buck last week, and given the unsettling inflationary prospects of the government flooding the market with additional Treasury notes to finance the Wall Street bailout, investors are reevaluating what constitutes a "safe haven."

The yield on the three-month Treasury note dropped to zero on Sept. 18, so great was demand for short-term T-bills by nervous investors fleeing equity and money markets. That was of course before Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson announced plans to take toxic mortgage-backed securities off investment banks' balance sheets.

The yield on 10-year U.S. Treasury bonds, at 3.83%, is currently very close to the long-term inflation rate, which means investors would barely preserve their purchasing power if they reinvested all the coupon payments to buy new Treasuries, Marc Schindler, a financial adviser at Pivot Point Advisors in Bellaire, Tex., wrote in an e-mail message to BusinessWeek. He's not alone in believing it's inevitable that yields will rise as the Treasury piles more than $700 billion onto the national debt, which is certain to stoke inflation and weaken the dollar's value.

Bailout Impact
Not everyone is convinced the issuance of a mound of additional Treasury notes will be all that inflationary. Some see it as a much better alternative to printing money to buy distressed assets from banks. The increase in the supply of Treasury notes in and of itself won't spark a big inflation hike unless the bailout helps to resolve the credit crisis and speeds an economic recovery, says James D. King, president and chief investment officer of National Penn Investors Trust Co. in Reading, Pa. If the bailout doesn't work and credit markets don't thaw, further deterioration in business activity will cause unemployment to rise and wages to stagnate or drop, which would offset any increased inflationary pressure, he predicts. The pullback in oil and other commodity prices from summer peaks has already helped relieve inflation risks. The surge in borrowing could also put the Treasury's triple-A credit rating at risk, Pivot Point's Schindler warned in his e-mail.

Investors can buy U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) to ensure the value of their investment keeps pace with inflation, but they take the chance of lower returns if inflation doesn't climb significantly, since the yield on 30-year TIPS is much lower than on comparable T-bills not adjusted for inflation. TIPS are also less useful for investors in higher-income brackets who tend to report a brisker pace of inflation for the goods they buy—closer to an 8% to 12% rate—than the inflation rate measured by the Consumer Price Index deflator, says Frank Trotter, president of Everbank Direct in Jacksonville, Fla.

A separate risk, though related to inflation concerns, is what damage the further ballooning of the national deficit might do to foreign investors' confidence in U.S. government bonds. One of the prime motivating factors for the nationalization of mortgage giants Fannie Mae (FNM) and Freddie Mac (FRE) was the government's need to assuage foreign investors that had loaded up on the agencies' debt. There is so much foreign money invested in U.S. Treasury bonds that it would only take a small portion of it to retreat to spark a major crisis for U.S. coffers, says Kirk Kinder, a certified financial planner at Picket Fence Financial in Bel Air, Md.

"This is a huge, watershed moment, not just for managing the dollar, but this is the biggest government intervention into our market-based economy," says Kinder. "[Overseas] investors are going to be nervous about investing in the U.S. because we've showed we can change the rules midstream."

In his view, the U.S. has gone from being the puppet master to the puppet, afraid of the consequences for the dollar were China to de-peg the value of its currency from the greenback and allow it to float.

Doubts About U.S. Financial Superpower Status
Brett Hellerman, chief executive of Wood Creek Capital Management, a hybrid hedge and private equity fund, sees the financial crisis and the call for such a huge bailout as just the latest in a series of misguided policy decisions over the past eight years that have severely eroded confidence in the U.S. "The price of the U.S. is going down. If we were a stock, we'd be for sale," he says. "I think the dollar is going to come under increasing attack here."

That kind of apocalyptic thinking is by no means confined to people on the margins. On Sept. 25, Germany's Finance Minister, Peer Steinbruck, predicted that as a result of the financial crisis, the U.S. will cede its role as a superpower of the world financial system to better-capitalized centers that are emerging in Asia and Europe, according to the Financial Times. That doesn't mean the dollar will lose its reserve currency status, but rather that it will become a more relative store of value, Steinbruck added.

Many investment professionals disagree, however. William Bellamy, director of fixed income portfolios at Thompson, Siegel & Walmsley in Richmond, Va., says he thinks the issuance of additional Treasury bills to pay for the bailout will have minimal impact on investor confidence in U.S. bonds as a safe haven. "Issuance will go up to fund the bailout but it will be over time. And if it corrects the underlying credit markets and unfreezes them, I don't think much concern at all should be put on the additional issuance," he says. "The U.S. is still the safest place in the world to invest and will remain that way."

If the bailout eventually tops $1 trillion, however, the size of the Treasury issuance could cause people to start questioning the credit quality of the dollar, he adds.

Other Countries' Bonds
The key to how much confidence foreign investors continue to place in the U.S. will be whether the bailout is structured to ensure the Treasury can recover a significant portion of its investment later on, in contrast to the Chrysler bailout of 30 years ago, says King at National Penn. That can be accomplished either by the government taking equity stakes in the banks it's buying securities from, or buying them at low enough prices or charging a sufficiently high interest rate on loans, he says.

Still, with the future supply and quality of Treasury bonds unknown, it's not a bad idea for risk-averse investors to consider some alternative vehicles.

Money-market funds remain a safe bet for those who want to preserve capital and get some extra yield since the Treasury said last week it will guarantee those accounts.

Buying bonds of other developed countries, such as Switzerland and Australia, which are known for better balancing their budgets and managing their national debt, is another option, financial advisers say. The T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (RPBIX) is a relatively low-cost way to get exposure to an assortment of countries' bonds. The fund requires a minimum initial investment of $2,500 and currently yields 3.78%. Others planners recommend emerging-market debt, whose yields tend to be higher, but these also carry too much risk to be considered safe havens.

King thinks the best opportunity right now is Fannie and Freddie bonds, whose yields are 1.42% higher than corresponding Treasury notes. That's quite a draw when you consider those bonds would be expected to trade much closer to Treasuries after the government made its guarantee of the agencies' debt explicit, he says.

"Perfect" Bond Asset Class?
Bill Larkin, portfolio manager for fixed income at Cabot Money Management in Salem, Mass., advises people to stay away from Fannie and Freddie debt except for shorter-dated maturities, since the agencies' fate remains to be seen. If they become part of the government, investors will win, whereas if they are broken into pieces, investors will lose because the debt will be much less liquid. He recommends other government agency debt such as that issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank or Ginnie Mae. He also suggests people buy these bonds to hold until maturity instead of buying them to trade them.

Kinder at Picket Fence questions whether there is a perfect bond asset class that can qualify as a safe haven right now. Over the long term, he thinks diversification of your portfolio is the best strategy, even if certain asset classes are currently getting hammered.

Larkin sees Treasury bills primarily as a "fear trade," which unfortunately has come to replace longer-term strategies for many investors overreacting to the abrupt escalation of the financial crisis. People who have fled into T-bills need to figure out a long-term plan, because otherwise they'll just be chasing returns, he says.

He also likes short-term corporate bonds of companies with high credit quality, which provide a low real (inflation-adjusted) return but with less volatility than stocks. This is a good time to buy them because by the time they mature in mid-2009, investors will know if the U.S. economy is in recession or poised to come out of one. As those short-term bonds mature, people can use the returns to dollar-cost average back into a balanced investing strategy comprised of stocks and bonds, he says.

Bogoslaw is a reporter for BusinessWeek's Investing channel.




http://banksit.blogspot.com
http://internationaltax1.blogspot.com
http://assetprotection.wordpress.com
http://proteccionactivos.wordpress.com
http://proteccionbienes.blogspot.com

12/9/08

Proteccion de los Activos de cualquier manera


"Protección de los Activos de cualquier manera" es un post en el blog http://cool-happy.com/, y que a continuación reproducimos solo en parte:

"Una parte importante de las finanzas y de gama alta es la protección de los activos de inversión.Un activo sistema de protección es un sistema de prácticas jurídicas que usa la gente para proteger sus bienes jurídicos de las resoluciones judiciales.En efecto, una garantía de la protección de los activos del sistema debería hacer una prueba de los activos de la sentencia.Es la protección de los bienes personales y la protección de los activos de negocio, aunque a menudo se encuentran en las empresas, donde más dinero se tratara.

El principio básico de la protección de los activos se basa en el hecho de que una persona o empresa que tiene activos potencialmente puede perder parte de los activos a los acreedores.Cuando las personas y las empresas ya no los propios bienes, no pueden ser alcanzados por los acreedores.Ese es el objetivo de las estrategias de protección de activos.Hay varias estrategias de protección de activos que tienen por objeto eliminar el título legal de una persona de negocios o de los activos al mismo tiempo la posibilidad de todos los beneficios de esos bienes.

La mejor estrategia de la protección de los activos debe ser aprobado antes de que haya realmente una necesidad de él, pero esta no es la forma en que habitualmente desempeña.Después de una demanda presentada por un acreedor, muchas personas todavía pueden participar en la planificación de la protección de los activos.Planificación de la protección de los activos puede considerarse una transferencia fraudulenta en este momento, pero por lo general no hay inconveniente para la protección de los activos de planificación, ya que sólo hay que dejar de lado.Una persona o empresa en la deuda a un acreedor puede no tienen nada que perder por la sencilla planificación de la protección de los activos.

Hay muchas estrategias de protección de activos en los Estados Unidos.Los diversos planes de la protección de los activos se basan en las necesidades de la persona o empresa.El sistema de protección de activos que es lo mejor para un partido dependerá de la naturaleza del bien que está protegida, como el alquiler de bienes raíces, personal de residencias, cuentas bancarias y planes de jubilación.El plazo de una reclamación o demanda judicial decidirá también la mejor estrategia de la protección de los activos, así como el riesgo de que el deudor la adversidad y la agresividad de los acreedores.

Las personas que buscan la protección de los activos de su casa, por ejemplo, han Aproximadamente siete diferentes opciones de la protección de los activos de acuerdo con algunos expertos jurídicos finanzas.Pueden transferir la propiedad a un fideicomiso con un nombre genérico, o transferir la propiedad a un fideicomiso irrevocable para garantizar la protección de los activos personales.También podrán gravar la residencia, grabar una simple escritura de fideicomiso, vender la residencia de un miembro de la familia con un plan de pago, o incluso vender la residencia a un extranjero por dinero en efectivo.Todos estos son completamente legales estrategias de la protección de los activos personales.

Simplemente cambiando el título legal a un fideicomiso con un nombre genérico es un activo plan de protección que pueden funcionar para algunos acreedores, pero no la mayoría.Muchos expertos jurídicos de finanzas insisten en que un mejor plan de la protección de los activos es un fideicomiso irrevocable de venta o total de la residencia.Otra consideración es o no de la protección de activos se convierta fácilmente el bien de dinero.Offshore fideicomisos offshore y cuentas bancarias son las opciones en esta circunstancia.Offshore la protección de los activos es eficaz, porque el bien está fuera del control de cualquier tribunal local, por lo que el deudor no puede ser ordenada para que el activo de nuevo a los Estados Unidos."




http://banksit.blogspot.com
http://internationaltax1.blogspot.com
http://assetprotection.wordpress.com
http://proteccionactivos.wordpress.com
http://proteccionbienes.blogspot.com

19/1/05

Donde confiar tu Trust






Es lo que se pregunta Anne Tergesen en este articulo publicado en http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_03/b3916099_mz070.htm. Como es estadounidense, se refiere a los distintos Estados de su país, pero lo mismo podría aplicarse en aquellos países que tienen reconocida esta figura jurídica:

Where To Entrust Your Trust?
States are coming up with new incentives, so it pays to look around

Picking the right location is the key to success in real estate. Now it's also a crucial decision in the sleepy world of trust funds. To lure a piece of the trust business, some states have recently enacted laws designed to make it attractive to establish trusts within their borders. As a result, it's possible to improve your trust's return, life span, and defenses against creditors simply by locating it in a particular state. "Shopping for a trust locale has become de rigueur in the industry," says Michael Smith, managing director at Deutsche Bank. (DB )

Which state you choose -- you don't have to use your home state -- will depend on your goals. For example, to maximize your trust's returns, you might pick a state with no income tax -- or at least none on trusts. Meanwhile, those intent on a lasting legacy can choose a state that allows trusts to live forever instead of for just a few generations. If legal liability is a concern, you might look at the few states that permit "domestic asset-protection trusts" -- or trusts designed to benefit you, while still protecting the assets from others. A word of caution: Since these trusts are irrevocable, you can't change your mind once you set one up.

While investment decisions will dictate your trust's financial success, you can lend a helping hand by selecting a tax-friendly jurisdiction. Trusts must pay federal taxes on their capital gains and any income they don't pass along to beneficiaries. They're also subject to federal estate, gift, and generation-skipping taxes. But you can select a host state that either has no state income tax or exempts trusts from paying it.

Be forewarned that this area of the law can be complex. Delaware, for example, exempts trusts with in-state trustees from paying its income tax -- but only if the beneficiaries live in other states. And no matter where your trust is, it may be liable for Illinois' income tax if the person who establishes it lives there, says Ed Orazem, managing director at Citigroup Trust. (C ) In contrast, New York and New Jersey generally impose no income tax on residents' trusts as long as the trustee is based in another state and the trust holds no state-based property or investments that generate income. To figure out your trust's tax exposure, check the laws of each state in which a trustee, grantor, and beneficiary live, says Catherine Keating, managing director at JPMorgan (JPM ) Private Bank.

90-YEAR SPAN
Where your trust is located can also make a big difference in its longevity. Most states require trusts to dissolve after about 90 years, a feature inherited from English common law. But 22 states plus the District of Columbia have changed their laws to permit irrevocable trusts with in-state trustees to endure for generations. That's a big deal, since a trust worth $1 million today that grows 8% a year and makes a 3% annual payout to heirs will have $131 million in 100 years, according to Richard Nenno, managing director at Wilmington Trust (WL ).

Another reason to shop for a trust locale is to better protect your money from legal action, including shielding your assets from creditors should you file for bankruptcy. Money put into an irrevocable trust for someone else -- say, your children -- is generally off-limits to creditors. But seven states, including Alaska, Delaware, and Nevada, have recently enacted laws that let you name yourself the beneficiary of a protected trust. Until recently, you could get this type of trust only by moving your money offshore to places including the Cook Islands in the South Pacific.

Still, because these new trusts have yet to be tested in court, they're not bulletproof. You also have to be willing to give your trustee control over distributions. And the trust can be ruled invalid if established after a legal claim arises. "I wouldn't use them to replace other asset protection techniques, such as liability insurance," says James Kronenberg, principal at Bessemer Trust.

If you already have a trust, can you move it to another state to take advantage of these new laws? Success is more likely if your trust document lets you change trustees and doesn't require a specific state to govern it. But while switching to an out-of-state trustee might help your trust reap income-tax benefits, it's unlikely to result in a longer life span. Why? Many trusts set an expiration date in the time frame allowed by their home state. A donor can go to court to request a change. But that can be expensive and time-consuming -- and there's no assurance of success. That's why it's key to choose the right state for your trust from the start.




http://banksit.blogspot.com
http://internationaltax1.blogspot.com
http://assetprotection.wordpress.com
http://proteccionactivos.wordpress.com
http://proteccionbienes.blogspot.com