09/03/09

El Koala tiene un 10,42% de beneficios en el 2009





Koala capital sicav, una Institución de Inversión Colectiva, con un perfil mixto, global y flexible, abierta a inversores, lleva un +10,42% de beneficios hasta ayer día 10 de febrero, correspondiente al 2009, cuando las bolsas llevan unas pérdidas de entre el -7% al -9%. Es decir que después de la leve pérdida del -5,96% del 2008, en solo 35 días han recuperado sobradamente la pérdida.

Felicidades!!!





http://banksit.blogspot.com
http://internationaltax1.blogspot.com
http://assetprotection.wordpress.com
http://proteccionactivos.wordpress.com
http://proteccionbienes.blogspot.com

08/03/09

Fundacion privada en Guernsey



November 2007

Background

Much of Guernsey's economic success over past decades
has been largely due to its adaptability and flexibility to react
to changing market situations and conditions. This
adaptability is no better illustrated than by the Island's
willingness to amend and review legislation to ensure that it
retains its position within the increasingly competitive
market place of international finance and over recent years
there have been many examples of this.

Following the revision of the Guernsey Trust Law - which
was approved by the Guernsey parliament in July this year
and now awaits approval by Privy Counsel - the Island is
now planning to introduce legislation to allow the
establishment of Foundations. This innovation will add a
useful new tool to the Island's current financial product mix
and will help ensure that Guernsey remains able to offer a
highly flexible spectrum of financial services to its global
client base.

The Foundation

Foundations have been created under the laws of other
jurisdictions from as early as 1926 (Liechtenstein). More
recently Panama introduced legislation in 1995, Netherlands
Antilles in 1998 and the Bahamas in 2004. Foundations over
this period have become increasingly popular across the
globe but particularly in civil law jurisdictions where the
concept of the Anglo-Saxon Trust is less well known and not
always wholly understood. In certain situations Foundations
can offer a viable alternative to the trust for commercial
structures, estate planning and for charitable purposes.
Whilst there is no single definition of a Foundation, there are
a number of common features and some interesting
comparisons to be made with trusts and companies alike.

Unlike a trust, a Foundation is a distinct legal entity and has
its own legal personality. It can hold assets, sue (or be sued)
in its own name, may enter into agreements with third
parties but unlike a company it has no shareholders. Since
some Foundations are established for charitable purposes,
they may or may not have beneficiaries.

A Foundation is formed by a Founder (either an individual or
corporate body) who provides the assets to be administered
by the Foundation under contractual rather than fiduciary
principles – giving a degree of comfort to those clients
unfamiliar with equitable principles. Beneficiaries of a
Foundation therefore have contractual rights rather than
proprietary rights in its assets. A key attraction is the ability
for the Foundation to reserve powers to its Founder. A
Founder may retain more control than is usual with a Settlor
of a trust. Commonly reserved powers include those relating
to such issues as investment strategy, the appointment and
removal of beneficiaries or even the power to revoke the
Foundation.

The Potential Guernsey Foundation

It is proposed that a Guernsey Foundation would be
established by Charter and run by a Council responsible for
fulfilling the Foundation's purpose as defined in the Charter
– which would also include the Foundation's name, details
of all Council members its registered office (which would be
in Guernsey) and the Foundation's purpose.
tself may be quite generic - for example "estate planning", or
may be something quite specific. It is envisaged that at least
one member of the Council will be a corporate body. The
Foundation would be entered on the public register however
details of the beneficiaries (if any) would remain confidential
as with a Trust subject only to the pre-existing rules
regarding disclosure in proper cases.

The provision of Council members or administrative services
to Foundations will be, a regulated activity as are trustee
services at present ensuring that the interests of clients and
the reputation of the Bailiwick is upheld.

Over and above the Charter, there will normally be a set of
Rules governing the mode of operation for the Council -
whose members would be subject to duties similar to those
of company directors. Unlike the Charter the Rules would be
a private document and not on the public registry.

It is not proposed that a Guernsey Foundation will be
restricted in terms of the type of assets it can hold. Therefore
whilst it is not envisaged that they will be used for purely
commercial purposes, they will potentially be able to hold
shares in a company carrying on commercial activities.
Filing requirements are likely to be limited to changes in
registered office and Council members and changes to the
Charter all of which would need to be registered immediately
the changes occur. If this is the case it's unlikely that an
annual return be required. The filing of audited financial
statements would be subject to the same exemptions
applicable to Guernsey companies meaning many of them
would fall outside the audit requirement. This will ensure that
pricing can remain competitive.

It is also proposed that the tax treatment of Foundations be
similar to that of Trusts with Guernsey trustees.
A Foundation can also have an Adviser whose role would be
set out in the Foundation Charter and Rules. This is largely
similar to the role of Protector within a Trust structure both
having powers such as to appoint or remove Council
members and beneficiaries, or the Adviser's consent may be
required before the Council carries out certain acts.
It should also be possible for a Guernsey Foundation to
migrate to another jurisdiction if so required and equally for
a Foundation established elsewhere to migrate into the
Island, a long as it fulfils requirements under the Guernsey
legislative framework.

An interesting possibility is to establish structures using both
Foundations and Trusts. Private Trust Companies (“PTCs”)
are very much in vogue. These are companies established
for the sole purpose of acting as trustee for one trust or, say,
one family. One issue that often concerns advisers is as to
the identity of those who will own the PTC. Often a purpose
trust is established to hold the shares in the PTC but as
Foundations need not have any beneficiaries it is possible
that they will be used as trustees themselves; a Private Trust
Foundation?

Conclusion
The introduction of Guernsey Foundations will offer the
Island's clients an excellent alternative structure assisting
with wealth management and will provide further choice and
flexibility to the Island's fiduciary sector.
The Foundation combines the flexibility of a trust with the
greater degree of transparency of a company. Given the
ability of a Founder to retain a certain amount of control and
the existing market demand for the Foundation structure
from civil law jurisdictions in particular, the Foundation can
only enhance the Island's competitive position in the market
place.


http://banksit.blogspot.com
http://internationaltax1.blogspot.com
http://assetprotection.wordpress.com
http://proteccionactivos.wordpress.com
http://proteccionbienes.blogspot.com

08/02/09

Indice de Millonarios



Muy interesante indice sobre la vida lujosa de los millonarios:

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Stonehage Affluent Luxury Living Index (SALLI) was
launched in London in 2007 in order to measure the
inflation experienced by High Net Worth (HNW) and
Ultra High Net Worth (UHNW) individuals and families.
SALLI is an index comprising a basket of luxury
goods and services determined by the Stonehage
Group, based on our knowledge and experience of
the spending patterns of HNW and UHNW families.
Prices in the index are the recommended retail prices
(including VAT where applicable) and SALLI accounts
for the frequency of purchase of each item over one
year. Prices were compared between 2006, 2007 and
2008, keeping the frequency of purchase of each item
consistent for each year1.
Wealth managers have traditionally used the Consumer
Price Index (CPI) as a measure of inflation when wealth
planning for their clients. SALLI, however, provides a
more realistic measure of inflation since the basket
of goods and services is more relevant to HNW and
UHNW families. Following strong interest in the original
London SALLI from clients and families, Stonehage has
now launched SALLI Switzerland.
Source of CPI figures: Swiss Federal Statistical Office (Dates used: 8/06, 8/07,
8/08); figures rounded to one decimal place.
• Between 2006 and 2008 the annualised SALLI
Switzerland was 7.3%, more than four times higher
than the annualised CPI at only 1.7%2.
Source of CPI figures: Swiss Federal Statistical Office (Dates used: 8/06, 8/07,
8/08); figures rounded to one decimal place.
• In the 12 months to August 2008, the increase in
SALLI dropped from 9.9% to 4.9%. In the same
period, CPI increased from 0.5% to 2.9%.
• Price inflation for luxury goods and services as
illustrated by SALLI is tending closer to the level of
inflation of general consumer goods and services
as measured by the CPI.
This year’s lower increase in SALLI compared to 2007
may be a result of:
• UHNW families decreasing their discretionary
spending on luxury goods and services as a result
of the slowing global economy.
• Providers of luxury goods and services having
less pricing power and containing price increases in
anticipation of falling demand.
CPI, the Swiss Government’s official inflation measure
may be too conservative to use when advising
Swiss-based HNW and UHNW families. Given the
disparities between CPI and SALLI from year to year,
Stonehage recommends that wealth managers use a
combination of CPI and SALLI when advising HNW
and UHNW families on their investments and longterm
wealth planning in order to safeguard clients’
wealth goals.

The Stonehage Group provides international families
with family office, wealth management and fiduciary
services. Stonehage is an independent multi-family
office, owned by its management and staff with nine
offices around the world. The Group advises clients
on protecting, managing and administering family
wealth including family governance and arrangements
for inter-generational wealth transfer. Stonehage
uses its wide range of expertise to manage the
governance and legal structures that are required in
order to best meet our clients’ investment, tax and
wealth transfer objectives, in addition to providing
advice on philanthropic arrangements.

2. INTRODUCING SALLI switzerland
The Stonehage Affluent Luxury Living Index (SALLI)
provides an indication of the trends in the cost of living
for HNW and UHNWs in Switzerland. This is important
because financial objectives of UHNWs are likely to
be based on real returns on capital, in which inflation
is a fundamental input. Therefore, monitoring actual
inflation experienced by UHNWs is essential in wealth
planning, in order to ensure that financial objectives
are met.

SALLI Switzerland tracks the price changes of luxury
items from 2006 to 2008, enabling the calculation
of luxury inflation. SALLI allows Stonehage to assess
the costs that UHNWs face more accurately and to
arrive at a more appropriate inflation figure, so that
recommended investment strategies are based on
more realistic spending patterns.

SALLI is the first Swiss Franc based luxury index of
this type and it consists of luxury goods and services
purchased by Swiss based UHNW families. For the
purpose of this study we have assumed that the basket
comprises items purchased by an UHNW family of two
adults and two children. This research also compares
SALLI to the CPI, Switzerland’s current headline
measure of inflation, to better understand high net
worth inflation and underlying trends3.

The Stonehage Group has in-depth knowledge of the
country due to its presence in Switzerland since 1986
and its long-standing relationships with local authorities
and service providers. Stonehage is one of the largest
independent multi-family offices in Switzerland, located
in Zürich, Neuchâtel and soon Geneva.

SALLI Switzerland focuses on the two major Swiss
cities, Zürich and Geneva, where many UHNW
families choose to live4. The canton of Zürich has
the highest population with 1.3 million people whilst
Geneva, which is much smaller with only 437,000
inhabitants, also remains an exclusive and popular
city5. In constructing the basket of goods and
services, we also accounted for the preferences of
UHNW families living in other cantons.

Switzerland’s low general inflation rate makes the
investigation into SALLI more compelling, since the wider
the gap between SALLI and general inflation as expressed
by CPI, the greater the potential wealth erosion.

A basket of luxury goods and services was determined
by Stonehage, based on the Group’s experience of the
spending patterns of Swiss-based UHNWs. In order
to compare how prices of these goods and services
have changed, a Laspeyres index was constructed. This
weights every item in the luxury basket according to
the frequency of purchase in a year. This frequency was
kept constant so that any change in the index was due
to changes in the price not in the quantities of the item
or service purchased.

A Laspeyres index was used as opposed to a Paasche
index because the former assumes that the frequency
of purchase per year remains constant between the
years of comparison, whilst the latter does not.
In order to calculate a value for the percentage rise
in the cost of living for UHNW individuals over the
relevant years, the formula below was applied to the
prices and frequency of purchased items.
Laspeyres Index
Pi,2008 / Pi,2006 = Price of item ‘i’ in 2008/2006
Qi = yearly purchase frequency
A Laspeyres index of this type can overstate UHNW inflation
since most consumers typically respond to price changes by
altering the quantities that they purchase. More specifically, an
increase in the price of an item might encourage consumers
to purchase less of the item in question, substituting other
items in its place. Therefore, because the assumed frequency
of purchase remains unchanged in SALLI, these items receive
a greater weighting than may be appropriate, potentially
overstating the impact of the price increase. Nevertheless, since
UHNW individuals are considered to be less price sensitive than
the average consumer, any exaggeration is likely to be small.
In the case of luxury goods and services, UHNW consumers are
often buying the brand which makes substituting goods more
difficult than with less strongly branded goods and services.
SALLI is intended to serve as a proxy for luxury inflation and
will allow Stonehage to tailor more appropriate investment
recommendations based on a more realistic assessment of the
increases in the cost of living experienced by UHNW families.

3. METHODOLOGY

Unlike the CPI, which represents inflation of all goods
and services purchased by the average consumer,
SALLI does not include every single item that a
typical UHNW individual would purchase. Prices are
all recommended retail prices including VAT, except in
cases where suppliers have provided an average of the
tariffs charged for each year. This is more appropriate in
cases where consumers would regularly face different
rates (e.g. the Geneva Opera House, where the price
would depend on the particular opera).

Furthermore, a number of the goods and services in
the luxury basket have been upgraded or discontinued
over the years. In these cases we have used an
equivalent item for each year as advised by the
respective suppliers. Since the index seeks to provide
an overview of the trends in the cost of living for
UHNW individuals, changes have also been allowed
for in the quality and specifications of the item in
some cases. For example, we compared the price of
a highest specification Porsche Cayenne, the Cayenne
Turbo for each year on the assumption that an UHNW
individual would always want to purchase the highest
specification model available at the time.

We have not made any adjustment for quality change. A
higher price for an improved product does not necessarily
mean that the “true” price has increased. However, this will
only cause a small upward bias to SALLI, since the vast
majority of goods in this index do not display regular
improvement through time, for example opera performances,
which fluctuate in quality.

A few of the goods and services in the luxury basket are priced
in Dollars, Euros or Sterling. These prices were converted
to their Swiss Franc equivalents using the exchange rate in
August of each year.

The methodology used for SALLI Switzerland and SALLI
London is the same. There is however a slight difference
in the composition of the baskets and the frequency of
purchase to reflect the tastes and availability of products
and services in each country.

The cultural differences between Switzerland and London
affected the choice of goods and services used in SALLI.
Where possible, alternatives were kept consistent to retain
the original focus. For example, the yacht charter in the
London SALLI has been replaced by a small motorboat
purchase for use on the Swiss lakes.

4.1 SALLI versus CPI
To monitor SALLI against inflation for the average
consumer, we have compared SALLI to the Consumer
Price Index (CPI).

CPI is the official Swiss price index used by the Swiss
government to measure inflation. The CPI consists of a
basket of goods, weighted according to the frequency of
purchase over one year, using Laspeyres. From time to
time the frequency of purchase and constituent items are
updated. The use of the Laspeyres method makes this
index particularly appropriate for comparison with SALLI.
Switzerland has two official indices constructed by the
Swiss National Bank (SNB) to measure inflation, CPI
which includes food and Core CPI which excludes food.
As this research project contains food in the Consumables
category we have chosen to compare SALLI with the CPI
rather than the Core CPI.

Table 1 shows that the growth of SALLI has decreased
significantly from 9.9% in 2007 to 4.9% in 2008.
Between 2006 and 2008 the annualised SALLI is 7.3%,
which is nearly four times higher than the annualised
CPI at only 1.7%. Therefore using CPI as the only
measure of inflation in wealth planning for UHNWs
could lead to an erosion of wealth.

Table 2 shows the changes in the ratio of SALLI to the
rate of inflation for the average consumer from 2006 to
2008 using the CPI. The ratio of SALLI to the CPI has
decreased substantially in the last year. This suggests
that the difference in price inflation for luxury versus nonluxury
goods is narrowing dramatically.

4.2 SALLI versus the average
change in prices
SALLI, which measures how the cost of a basket of
luxury goods and services changes over time, showed an
annualised increase of 7.3% from 2006 to 2008. We have
calculated the average price of single unit prices in each
year to consider by how much the cost of the average
product and service has risen.

4.3 How prices have changed in
each spending category
Segmentation of SALLI provides greater insight into
the categories of items that are exerting upward and
downward pressure on SALLI. Table 3 considers the
average price increase of the items in each category.
Consumables have experienced the largest increases in
price from 2006 to 2008. This is based on average prices
and does not take into account the quantities and values
of items purchased.

4. INDEX RESULTS AND ANALYSIS

The research confirms that SALLI does not track the
behaviour of CPI and that the relative movement of
these two indices demonstrates the need to separately
monitor luxury goods inflation. Both CPI and UHNW
inflation need to be understood and considered when
advising families on wealth management, investments
and long-term wealth planning in order to safeguard
their wealth goals.

SALLI Switzerland and SALLI London show similar
development trends. In both Switzerland and London,
SALLI increased to over 6% up until 2007. In the year
2007-2008 SALLI Switzerland at 4.9% is more than one
and a half times higher than the Swiss CPI at 2.9%.
SALLI London in the same year is 3.3% compared to
the UK CPI at 3.0%.

Overview
The Stonehage Group provides international families with
family office, wealth management and fiduciary services.
Stonehage is an independent multi-family office, owned
by its management and staff with nine offices around the
world. The Group advises clients on protecting, managing
and administering family wealth including family
governance and arrangements for inter-generational
wealth transfer. Stonehage uses its wide range of expertise
to manage the governance and legal structures that are
required in order to best meet our clients’ investment, tax
and wealth transfer objectives, in addition to providing
advice on philanthropic arrangements.

Company History
Stonehage was established in 1976 in London to provide
international families with fiduciary services and capital
protection. In 1997 Stonehage sold a majority stake
in the business to ABSA Bank and in 2005 the Group
returned to being management controlled. The Group
now employs over 300 staff and manages the affairs of
over 1,100 clients.


Legal Disclaimer
This publication is intended to provide only general information and to highlight points of interest. It is not intended to be
comprehensive or sufficient for making decisions and should not be relied upon. Specific professional advice should be sought on
the facts of any matter before action is taken.

http://banksit.blogspot.com
http://internationaltax1.blogspot.com
http://assetprotection.wordpress.com
http://proteccionactivos.wordpress.com
http://proteccionbienes.blogspot.com

20/01/09

El servicio de correo de Microsoft, Yahoo! y Google no es seguro


"El servicio de correo de Microsoft, Yahoo! y Google no es seguro" es una noticia distribuida por FACUA a varios periódicos, y que Lavanguardia.com sintetiza así:

Madrid. (EFECOM).- FACUA-Consumidores en Acción ha denunciado a Microsoft, Yahoo! y Google ante la Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) por "un grave problema de seguridad" en sus servicios de correo electrónico.

Esta organización ha informado en una nota de prensa de esta acción porque, según han argumentado, "cualquiera puede acceder a la cuenta de correo de otro usuario con sólo conocer dónde vive y la respuesta a una pregunta de seguridad", que "en muchos casos es fácil de averiguar".

Como ejemplo de este problema, esta asociación ha mencionado la reciente extorsión al cantante David Bisbal, al que cuatro personas, ya detenidas, le reclamaban una elevada cantidad de dinero a través de mensajes de correo electrónico a cambio de no divulgar la información sustraída de sus e-mails.

FACUA ha detallado que para apoderarse por ejemplo de una cuenta de Hotmail (Microsoft) o Yahoo! sólo es necesario entrar en sus respectivas web.

Una vez dentro, teclear la dirección de correo electrónico indicando que su contraseña ha sido olvidada, señalar el país, provincia y código postal de su propietario y contestar correctamente a una pregunta que éste seleccionó al activarla o modificarla.

En este sentido, FACUA cree que la recuperación de una contraseña de correo sólo debe permitirse mediante su envío a una dirección electrónica alternativa facilitada por el usuario cuando dio de alta su cuenta.

Esta asociación de consumidores, ha recordado que en 2004 ya había reclamado a Microsoft que eliminase el sistema de la "pregunta de seguridad", pero "tras una reunión con la compañía en la que su departamento legal se comprometió a analizar el asunto, no volvió a recibir respuesta alguna".

Hasta que las compañías modifiquen sus protocolos de seguridad, FACUA ha recomendado a sus usuarios que eliminen la "pregunta de seguridad" si el sistema se lo permite o modifiquen sus datos de forma que su país o provincia sean falsos o la respuesta no guarde ninguna relación con la pregunta.

http://banksit.blogspot.com
http://internationaltax1.blogspot.com
http://assetprotection.wordpress.com
http://proteccionactivos.wordpress.com
http://proteccionbienes.blogspot.com

España: asegurando el patrimonio


"Impuestos, tasas, contribuciones, peajes...", un articulo sincero y sin pelos en la lengua publicado hoy en Lavanguardia.es. y escrito por JOAN PASCUAL I BALAGUER, un lector que opina en el famoso periódico:

"Si miramos con detenimiento la historia de los últimos 300 años, los catalanes vemos que no es precisamente que nos haya ido bien. Para no alargarme, me limito a los últimos 30 años, en los que pasamos la crisis del 79/83, la del 92/96 y ahora, la actual, que dicen que es la peor de todas y no es culpa de nadie. La cuestión es que quizás es cierto que ni el muy poco eficaz y competente Gobierno Español tenga nada que ver o más bien, sólo en decisiones poco acertadas.

Qué decir del Gobierno catalán, en su línea de inoperancia e incompetencia supina. Ni tan siquiera ha conseguido que los catalanes en derechos y obligaciones seamos iguales al resto de España. Tanto Estatuto, tanto Gobierno Periférico y "res de res", humo en cantidad industrial y encima tenemos que agradecer al Gobierno de España que el Impuesto Extraordinario del Patrimonio lo hayan eliminado muy a pesar del Sr. Castells y el resto de aficionados a legislar como se baila una Sardana, que no es poco.

Sin embargo, lo que si sé es que el déficit, los 500.000 españoles nacionalizados que probablemente regresen con derecho a 18 meses de subsidio sumados a los que aquí se van a producir en ese periodo, los FOGASAS a pagar, la huída de las multinacionales en desbandada que ni percibiendo ayudas ilegales monetarias van a sostener el empleo…Todo sumado supone una olla a presión y lo vamos a pagar con dinero contante y sonante.

De eso sí que vamos a participar en un muy alto grado. Lo haremos en forma de incremento de impuestos, tasas, contribuciones, peajes, recargos, más la imaginación que ponen algunos funcionarios de Hacienda en interpretar la normativa. Todo ello, ante la impasible mirada de los Bancos y Cajas a salvo ya, impertérritos, viendo cómo el ciudadano medio se empobrece y agoniza con un patrimonio neto negativo.

Señores, vayan asegurando a todo riesgo el patrimonio que no se puedan llevar y vayan tramitando permisos de residencia en países cuyo horizonte esté un poco más despejado y no tengan el tsunami encima mismo. ¡Ah! estos países por increíble que parezca existen, puedes conectarte por Internet a sus webs estatales y ver cómo evoluciona su economía, valores inmobiliarios, empleo, impuestos, etc."



http://banksit.blogspot.com
http://internationaltax1.blogspot.com
http://assetprotection.wordpress.com
http://proteccionactivos.wordpress.com
http://proteccionbienes.blogspot.com